28 Jul 2013, 12:10am
General:
by

Comments Off on Man And Woman: Unity And Struggle Of Opposites ?

Man And Woman: Unity And Struggle Of Opposites ?

A friend of mine often ends the discussion with a woman with a phrase: 'Yes, dear, you're certainly right. I prefer not to argue with women. " He – man, if someone does not understand. I was totally sympathize with him in the men and women think quite differently, and therefore to argue with the opposite sex is useless and counterproductive. Men and women so differently think that they can not even understand each other, as if speaking in different languages. But today, when I drove the car (by the way, behind the wheel come sometimes very good idea, some special event, I still do not understand), I realized that I was wrong.

Ie with initial data that thinking men and women differently and find it difficult to understand each other, I still absolutely agree. Alter the conclusions of this obvious fact. Argue useful and very productive. Talk without controversy of course, too, do not know, however, that effective. Try to explain why. When a man and a woman analyze the situation, they do it differently. And if before the beginning of the dispute or the conversation they will have a common goal, for example, to find out the truth, uncover why her husband nagging boss, and colleague-to-female constantly makes small dirty, or as a child to behave in a new school, etc., then the analysis of them will be much more accurate than each separately.

Because everyone will look like 'their part'. Well, it's like watching some process by lightning, for example, by not one but two kinds of devices. Let this be a camera and a barometer – the picture becomes much more informative and useful. When two people are separated, they can be very long thinking the same thought, then move to the next when they think together, the findings are repelled from each other and the ascent to the top of some kind, the conclusion is much faster. And in the man-woman version of this phenomenon is still more intensified. Therefore, I think, foolish to scold our initial opposition, but because of need for such a resource and use it for mutual benefit. But it is possible for one very important condition: the purpose, intent must be reciprocal, ie mutual. And before the dispute must 'tune on the same wavelength. " If I listen to the radio, and he catches a frequency slightly wrong, I'm looking for, then I would hear the sound, distorted rustling and crackling. If the frequency is not the same, then do not hear anything. But if the frequency is accurate, then the sound will be clean. Likewise, we need to dispute the 'Customize' on the same frequency. How? I propose to try to put yourself in your opponent and to imagine that he could think. Then you can catch each other's frequencies, and correlation to the overall communication frequency automatically. And you can even throw pots at the same time, the external form does not matter. Ekaterina Shipulina