Scientific Methodology
The search of knowing becomes important and pleasant when the child learns playing. It is possible, through playing, forming individuals with autonomy, motivated for many interests and capable to learn quickly. To conclude, playing it could be enrolled as practical illustration instrument complementing the theory, however, pedagogically very enriquecedor, therefore when displacing the citizen defying if putting into motion it and to interact with its pairs, its space and its environment, in the measure where determined game, or proposal playful is related to the subject and the learning proposal that the professors are presenting at that moment, other knowledge enter in action; as respect the rules, the communication clarity, the reinforcement of the affective bond between the group, the desinibio, the confidence of some stops with the others, among others questions of values, as solidarity, friendship, understanding other knowledge that if articulate between itself, on for a teia or a great net becoming incorporated itself one in the other. In fact, a proposal playful, centered in playing in the educative space that includes and receives to all, that the tolerant convivncia with the differences articulates, leagues in this subjective and singular net, where in the exercise of the human meeting, each moment is only. Full of incompressible mysteries, encantamentos, disenchantments, conquests and challenges. However, it is important to know that the society is made per item and each one that circulates for our lives during one year, some years and thus successively. It is to provoke a daily metamorphosis, transforming and leaving if to transform. thus to go touching the life, as a boat that sails, to the times in calmer waters, for other turbulent ones, but with the certainty and confidence of that it will arrive at the destination.
Reiterating History
From this vision of education and the proper historical knowledge, the chance slight knowledge had led, many times, to a teleologic and intentional perspective of History. Without losing of seen the complexity of this question, it is important to make possible to the pupils the understanding of that the historical events cannot be explained in simplista way. It is necessary to make to understand them that numerous relations, of different weights and characteristics, intervene with its accomplishment. However, it is known that if the professor really wants to construct one practical one of education of History that privileges the understanding of the subject pupil while of History, of a history that is not given and yes constructed, hardly it will obtain to work the content all programmarian. 2.3. Methodology Reiterating the affirmation from that the history education has suffered some transformations, is observed that the traditional boarding has yielded place the new forms to teach History.
Before, it fit to the pupils the memorization of names, dates, places among others points that added to the pupil only one momentary knowledge. In accordance with (MOREIRA and VASCONCELOS, 2009, P. 36), the good pupil was not that one that wise person to express its creativity. In contrast, he was better evaluated that one that she knew to reproduce ready formulas from a project of questions and answers. This traditional model of education was so impregnated in the mind of the people, who many do not believe that History must be understood and not simply decorated. The new presented boardings have contributed for a redirecionamento of practical the pedagogical ones in the history education. What one expects of educating is that this knows to establish relations between different facts or structures in order to form a vision of set of the historical reality. In this perspective, the pupil leaves to act as a passive being and passes to be understood as a constructor of the knowledge.
Method Function
The perception of the citizens is that this if does not constitute as maximum definitive enters professors, many had not perceived as something intrinsic its work and act with certain indifference in relation to this aspect of the profession. Also I see that all the formation depends on the citizen to be or not engaged with the profession. (Subject to) For the interviewed managers, we live in a complex society where innumerable transformations come occurring and considered questions basic as the education, limits, discipline, moral values and ethical, amongst others, they finish being seen for the families as only responsibility of the school. A split between educating and acquisition of knowledge is established, therefore they perceive … to educate, over all, as social function of the family and to construct knowledge as social function of the school. (Subject C). b) Metodolgica boarding of the professor The domain of the knowledge is important, but form as the knowledge is transmitted, used language, resources, examples, at last, what usually we call metodolgicos resources of the professor are determinative, therefore can inhibit or assist the learning of the student. All the citizens of the research believe that stimulaton and incentive are associates to the method used for the professor, and that on this its success depends.
Differences between ways stand out to apply and to organize lessons of a professor for another one. The differences between methodologies of one and another professor visibly are perceived. The professor exists who searchs new ways, alternatives so that the learning occurs. Others, however, do not search resources different and always use the same methodologies and, therefore, they do not stimulate the pupils to the research. (Subject B). The challenge of the formation of the professors … is to have a distinct orientation for its function, is to transform them into professionals of ' ' aprendizagem' ' , instead of specialists who know a subject well and know to explain it, leaving the task to learn as exclusive function of the pupil, which will have to strengthen itself very until assimilating, in fact, what the professor taught to it.
Sociological Method
Considering globally, the cinema is before more nothing a fact, and while such it places problems for psychology of the perception and the knowledge, for the aesthetic theoretician, the sociology of the public, the semiologia geral.' ' (METZ, 2010, P. 16) 2. SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CINEMA the term ' ' representations coletivas' ' it was created by Emile Durkheim, with intention to separate the social thought of the individual thought. The main objective of Durkheim was to affirm Sociology as science, breaching with the ideas and the common sense, presenting it with an object of study and a method of analyzes applicable. In its intitled workmanship the Rules of the Sociological Method, published in 1895, are pointed the concept and the main characteristics of ' ' fact social' ' being they: previous and exterior to the individual, coercive or general and collective. Arriving the conclusion of that the social fact is a thing, and the object of study of Sociology. ' ' All way is fact social to make, settled or, susceptible not to exert on the individual an exterior coercion, or still, all way of to make that it is general in the extension of a given society e, at the same time, possesss a proper, independent existence of its manifestations individuais' '. (DURKHEIM, 2007, P.
13) Leaving that it exists a distanciamento clearly the object of study of the sociology and of psychology enters. The studies of the collective conscience fit the sociology that affirms that the social reality only can be understood by means of a study of the laws and representations of this collective. The analysis of the social life consists of creating a speech of scientific matrix that if bases on the diverse collective relations. Individual and society are placed in specific spaces for the durkheimiana optics, in order to become objective more the study of the all that forms the social reality, leaving of the confusion of existing relations between the beings compose that it.